requestId:6852d9fc723fd8.99658393.
Can the academic inheritance of the school history exist?
Author: Liu Zongsheng (Southeast Major Research Institute)
Source: “History of Chinese Philosophy” 2022 Issue 3
Abstract: Can the academic inheritance of the school history exist? Baocai.comThis is a disputed issue in the long-term research and development. With the emergence of more and more related literature, the views on related learning inherited by the history of the existing school have received more historical support. First, we sorted out the self-conferent points of scholars in the past, and found that scholarship was founded by Zhang Xuan of the Northern Song Dynasty, inherited and developed by Confucian scholars in the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, and finally ended in the early stages of the country. Secondly, we explore the school’s self-recognition and similarity of students’ studies: the academic learning includes both the self-conception of “the teacher is the teacher” in terms of teacher inheritance, and the inheritance of “teaching as teaching” in terms of inheritance. Finally, the discovery of the academic style of “teaching with gifts” is the profound theoretical characteristics and academic inheritance of the academic history inheritance.
Keywords: School of learning; Learning to adulthood; Total learning; To worship practical application; Teaching;
As the main school of New Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties, it was created by Zhang Xuan from Guanzhong area during the Northern Song Dynasty. This is a common understanding in the academic community. But can Guanxue be inherited during the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties? There is a disagreement in the academic world. Some scholars believe that Confucian scholars in Guanzhong area did not have the knowledge of inheritance from Zhang Xiu in the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. The study ended in the late Northern Song Dynasty or the early Southern Song Dynasty. There is no academic history inheritance in history that began in the Northern Song Dynasty and ended in the Qing Dynasty; some scholars believe that there is a academic history inheritance in history that started in the Northern Song Dynasty and ended in the Qing Dynasty. It can be seen that whether the academic knowledge inherited by the school history can exist is still a question for the needs of academic research.
After exploring the debate on whether there can be any related learning in the academic world through school history, it is actually a discrepancy between the two parties to judge the standard of inheritance of relevant learning. Zhang Dainian said: “Zhang Hui said that there are two main characteristics: one is based on atmosphere, and the other is based on gifts. Later, scholars in the area of central China have evolved the style of gifts and taught, but have not developed the concept of atmosphere.” [1] From the perspective of whether there is a dispute over the inheritance of school history, there is a view of the inheritance of school history, and “gifts and teaching” is an important inheritance standard; there is no view of the inheritance of school history, and “Baobao.com dcardAutomaticallyAs the basis of the inheritance standards of the 博官网发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发 However, reading the works of the Related Education in the past has found that students have widely regarded “treat as teaching” as the judgment standard for inheritance of relevant learning. This makes people confused: when modern scholars face the problems related to school history inheritance, why do most of them choose “emotion-based” as the judgment standard, but rarely choose “selected online single timeTraining gifts as teaching” as the judgment standard? Sincerely, compared with “game-based thinking”, “gift-based learning style” is relatively erect and lacks focus thinking to support the department. But the question is: Why do current academic students regard “gifts as teaching” as the judgment standard for academic inheritance? It can be seen that whether “teaching as a teacher” can be based on relevant inheritance is a question that needs to be answered from the perspective of history; more importantly, the answer to this question can also provide a foundation for whether there is a problem related to the inheritance of the school history. It is seen that the text is settled in a large number of related literatures. Referring to the research results of the academic community that there is a related education through the inheritance of the school history, we will answer the questions about whether the related education can be based on the inheritance of the school history through our thoughts on whether the teaching can be based on the inheritance of the school history.
1. Self-agreement of relevance – “It can still become a school”
For relevance students, there is no problem in whether relevance can exist as a school inherited from the history of the school, because they always believe that relevance is a unified school. The school of scholars in the Ming Dynasty regarded themselves as the “Quan School”. Although scholars in the Qing Dynasty had the understanding that “there are few people who have learned from the Qu” (“Collection of Joseph Lin” was published, page 242), they believed that “Collection of Joseph Lin” has never been “interrupted” (Collection of Joseph Lin” was published, page 641). During the international era, students still believed that: “If you are talking tomorrow, you can still become a school” (“Collected by Niu Zhaolian”, page 198). In the eyes of students, there is a study inherited by the school’s history.
There is a study inherited by the school history because Confucians in the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties generally regarded Zhang Xuan as their teachers. Confucian scholars in the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties believed that “the ancestor of sects” and even said in a religious manner that “the sects are the sects of sects” (“Collected by the Collection of Teachers of the Kung Pao,” published, page 76). Upholding this confidence, they politely said, “Yinqu is my teacher” [2]. In the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, Confucian scholars regarded Zhang Xu as teachers, not only because “the learning of the Yuanzhong period was first, the teacher of the Qu master took the lead” (“Erqu Collection”, page 178), but even believed that “from Confucius, only the only one who understands the knowledge is Linqu” (“Li Yuanchun Collection”, page 714). Based on this understanding, they suggest that Confucians in the Chinese should short-term maintenanceHe was a teacher, and criticized the “supervisor who has no ambition” (“Collected by the Master of Teachers of the Book of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Lord of the Regarding the promotion of Confucianism, they also advocated “Chasing for the ultimate learning, and the sacred is the teacher” (“Collected Works of Mary”, page 627). As for the teacher’s inheritance, there is a study of the inheritance of the school’s history.
There is a study of inheritance from the school history, and the more important reason is the study of Zhang Xiu, the Confucian scholars in the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. Zhang Liumen student Lu Da Lin and others once came from Er Cheng after Zhang Liu died of illness; but as Cheng said, these people “stayed in the canal and learned very well” (“Er Cheng Ji” published, page 265): This is actually to accept Luo Xue’s thinking to develop the relevant studies. Tongshu of the Yuan Dynasty had the ambition of “restoring the tide of Luo” (“Three Schools of Religion in the Yuan Dynasty”, page 137), which also reflects the idea of accepting Luo School to revitalize the study. Before the New Confucianism of the Ming Dynasty, there was Zhu Zi’s study in a regular position, and later there was Yang Mingxue, which was popular across the country. However, “the righteous people in Guanxi still adhered to the rule of the county” (“Records of the Civil Society”, page 123), which was not what they said: Zhang Xiu’s study was continued to be inherited by Confucian scholars in the Ming Dynasty. The Confucian scholars in the Qing Dynasty TC: