requestId:68499ac05e3458.41536730.
“The Doctrine of the Mean” and Tang Weizhi, Han and Song dynasties
Author: Wu Feifei (produced by Beijing Department of Philosophy)
Source: “Capital Teachers’ Major Sciences. Social Science Edition” 2019 Issue 1
Time: The heroine of Confucius’s second-five shines. 19th day of the 19th day of the 19th year of Jihai and Mid-Spring in 1970
� large;”>Abstract
Teacher Tang Weizhi, a civilized celebrity from the late Qing Dynasty to the People’s Republic of China, was from the scholar Huang Yuan, and was also a famous scholar in theory. How did he handle the relationship between the Han and Song dynasties in Teacher Huang? This article compares the differences between Tang Dynasty’s “The Great Mean” and Zhu Zi’s “The Chapter and Sentences of the Doctrine of the Mean” and Huang Yuan and “Zi Si Zi’s Interpretation”, pointing out that he has both praised and criticized the views of the Zhu and Huang families. Focusing on teaching and ethics and adapting to the requests of the new era is the most important feature of the Tang Dynasty’s teacher’s thinking, and it is also the purpose of his learning from both Han and Song dynasties.
Teacher Tang Weizhi, the chief teacher of the late Qing Dynasty, was one of the few scientific scholars among students in Nanjing. Teacher Huang, a famous scholar in education and worship, was known as the three major teachers of the late Qing Dynasty, as well as Yu Quyuan and Sun Zhongrong, and were also regarded as the extension of the Qianlong and Jiaqing Han schools in the late Qing Dynasty. Therefore, his door was mostly taught by students and worship students. Only the only teacher Tang Weizhi is a psychologist. Of course, this is closely related to Teacher Tang from Teacher Wang Zixiang in his early years, but we still cannot ignore the teaching he received at Nanjing Bookstore. We cannot believe that all the sciences are obtained from Teacher Wang. Even Teacher Tang’s theory thoughts are still related to Teacher Huang, who emphasized the Han and Song ranks. Perhaps, the learning of Nanjing Book Academy has enabled Teacher Tang to gain a new perspective on studying science. This can help us understand what Teacher Tang learned about Han and Song Jiancai, and can even understand the situation of the students of Yuan and even the early Han and Song Jiancai in the late Qing Dynasty.
1. Teacher Wei Zhi and Teacher Yuan Chenggong
It can be seen from the diary, letters and years that the relationship between Teacher Yuan Chenggong and Teacher Wei Zhigong was very close and came to the past. The “Case of Teacher Huang Yuan Chenggonggong” written by Teacher Tang is more detailed and profound than Zhang Taiyan’s study case, and it is also conquered by the Yuan Chenggong’s department in “The Case of Confucianism” in Xu Juren’s “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Confucianism” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of Religiousness” in “The Case of ReligiousnessIt can only be regarded as one of the most important results of the academic master’s teacher in the National Academy of Sciences. Even if you read it today, it still has great reference value.
This “Study Case” discusses the important works of Mr. Huang and gives ratings from a similar system. Among them, Teacher Tang emphasized the “Training Comparison” of Teacher Yuan’s “Training Comparison” and said: “As soon as the book is published, learning and theory will be learned in one.” [1] The meaning of this is that the teaching advocated by Teacher Lin in the early Qing Dynasty, which was the theory that Teacher Yuan’s teaching was initiated by Teacher Yuan. Teacher Tang also quoted Liu Zhiren’s evaluation: “In this way, we can understand it, and we can adapt to the world, so that we will not be conceived as reasoning and will destroy the affairs of the whole country.” [2] Taking opinions as reasoning is Dai Dongyuan’s criticism of theory, especially Wang Xuexue. Teacher Tang naturally understands it, and quoting Liu’s words here is to call Dongyuan and modify the theory. He also recorded the words of Mr. Huang in his place: “Dai Dong’s original student, “Mencius of Mencius’s Characters,” and it is all true, but it is almost like a ruin.” [3] Although Mr. Tang, Mr. Huang, even praised Mr. Wang in his late years, he did not ignore the revisions of the science of the father and son of Dai Dongyuan to the Huang family. [4]
Wei Zhi also attaches great importance to the book “Zi Si Zi’s Interpretation” by Teacher Huang. Teacher Huang taught the interpretation of “Zi Sizi” in his late years, which meant that “Mencius should seek the learning of Confucius and Zengzi, and he must regard Zisi as his new year.” He also said, “After adding me for several years, the interpretation of “Zi Sizi” was completed, and there is no regret.” It is obvious that he values the book very much. Therefore, Wei Zhi thought that this book was completed after all, “the teacher and teacher’s ambition was more and more refined in his learning” [5]. Wei Zhi did not regard the head of Master Yuan as a Han scholar, but regarded it as a Confucian scholar who was one of the same academic and scientific principles. Therefore, he called: “The teacher and Master are good at reasoning, so he studied and studied the reasons, distinguished the length and shortness, and made the details full of the universe.”[6] Even the teachings that mainly consider text and distinguished the rules of the rules have not fallen into this purpose. : “Thank you to the heart, develop your nature, receive your destiny, and be rank in heaven. Those who are saints and those who walk on it are worthy.” [7]
Teacher Tang, the comprehensive and evaluations of his studies and teachers, has many differences with those who are later generations. It is his deep experience in his years of experience and the essence he has obtained from his studies. Therefore, he defined the position of Mr. Huang in the history of academic history in the Qing Dynasty in this way:
The style of learning in the Kingdom and advocated the teaching of Mr. Huang Tinglin and Mr. Huang Lizhou. Teacher Tinglin said that learning is science, and learning beyond science is learning, so learning and science should be integrated into one, and it should not be different from two. He was the teacher of Zheng Jun and Zhu Zi, and followed Confucius to study, blogged about papers and offer gifts, and seek truth from facts. Those who gain what they gain in their hearts and learn from later generations have no doubts about ghosts and gods. They have been waiting for the saints for a hundred generations, and they have been defeated by Jiang Shenxiu and Wang Baitian, the teacher who taught him. [8]
This comment is highly rated by Mr. Huang, and it is also very interesting. The theory of the study of Guingting Lin is the science, which is not only the theme of the entire academic tradition of the Qing Dynasty, but alsoTeacher Huang’s academic standards need not be discussed. Teacher Huang said that Teacher Huang was the inheritor of two scholars, Jiang Shenxiu and Wang Baitian, who had a great success in the Song Dynasty, which was not developed by future generations. Jiang Shenxiu was an instructor to the Qianlong and Jiaqing scholars Dai Dongyuan, Cheng Yixuan, Jin Fuzhi and others, and then developed the Anhui school tradition of Qianlong and Jiaqing academics. However, he not only had academic works such as “The Book of the Book of the Book of the People” and “The Book of the Country”, but also respected Zhu Zi’s learning and wrote “A Collection of Thoughts and Interpretations”. His “The Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book o